Elusive
Elusive won 3 of 9 parsed maps (33.3%), 46.6% of CT rounds and 33.9% of T rounds.
Most played map: Ancient, with 33.3% of maps won.
- Maps
- 3–6
- Match
- 2–3
- Win %
- 33.3%
- CT rounds
- 46.6%
- T rounds
- 33.9%
- Pistols
- 78.6%
By map
| Map | Played | Won | Win % | CT rounds | T rounds | Pistols |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ancient | 3 | 1 | 33.3% | 66.7% | 37.5% | 100.0% |
| Inferno | 3 | 2 | 66.7% | 50.0% | 33.3% | 83.3% |
| Mirage | 1 | 0 | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Nuke | 1 | 0 | 0.0% | 0.0% | 25.0% | 50.0% |
| Anubis | 1 | 0 | 0.0% | 16.7% | 40.0% | 50.0% |
Players
| Player | Maps | K | D | A | +/− | ADR | KAST | HS% | Swing | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FRIZZY | 7 | 80 | 81 | 34 | -1 | 75.2 | 72.9% | 55.0% | -0.2% | 1.16 |
| austin | 7 | 85 | 94 | 24 | -9 | 75.5 | 62.8% | 52.9% | -0.8% | 1.10 |
| Jonji-JLC | 5 | 61 | 73 | 37 | -12 | 78.5 | 76.0% | 52.5% | -0.1% | 1.09 |
| Coach|MaestrO | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 100.0% | – | 0.0% | 0.78 |
| Msaia | 4 | 59 | 52 | 19 | +7 | 82.8 | 71.5% | 52.5% | +2.8% | 1.29 |
| sayN | 4 | 55 | 50 | 23 | +5 | 87.7 | 77.9% | 45.5% | +0.6% | 1.24 |
| LittleBEER | 1 | 9 | 14 | 3 | -5 | 57.0 | 73.7% | 55.6% | -1.0% | 0.97 |
| Treehen | 3 | 32 | 41 | 9 | -9 | 76.1 | 71.1% | 46.9% | -1.4% | 1.12 |
| Redman | 2 | 11 | 30 | 3 | -19 | 38.7 | 45.5% | 36.4% | -5.0% | 0.55 |
Recent matches
- Elusive vs Marsborne 0–2 FRAG University 2026
- SportsBetExpert vs Elusive 2–0 FRAG Midwest St. Louis 2026
- Elusive vs NuTorious 2–0 ESL Challenger League Season 52 North America Cup 1
- Shimmer vs Elusive 1–2 ESL Challenger League Season 52 North America Cup 1
- Marsborne vs Elusive 2–0 ESL Challenger League Season 52 North America Cup 1
Events
Rating weighs kills, deaths, damage, KAST and round swing per round, each adjusted for the round's economy; about 1.00 is average. Swing is how much a player moved their team's chance of winning the round, per round. Numbers from Subtick's own parse of the match demos.